Operations

Lean Six Sigma, Pt. 2: AI Changes Processes. It Doesn’t Eliminate Discipline.

This second of our four-part series explores why the most successful AI transformations are built on trust, control and domain expertise, not technology alone.

June 18, 2026

Share

Editor's Note: This is the second in a four-part article series. See Part 1 here.

The Challenge

There is a growing belief, especially in tech circles, that “AI doesn’t optimize processes. It replaces them.” Examples often cited include no-code AI agents replacing multi-step workflows; customer service shifting from queues to conversational resolution; planning moving from structured cycles (S&OP) to continuous prediction; and back-office functions collapsing into autonomous systems. The implication: If processes disappear, then Lean Six Sigma becomes irrelevant.

My view: This is partly…

This is a Premium Article

Join NAW to read the full article — plus access to research, data, and intelligence.

As a member, you get:

  • Unlimited premium MDM articles, case studies, and monthly intelligence reports
  • Access to webcasts, podcasts
  • Exclusive whitepapers, research reports, and market data
  • Quarterly M&A, MarketPulse, and Economic Outlook reports
  • Access to NAW Nucleus, NAW SmartBrief, and NAW’s policy and leadership resources

The NAW Professional Membership is $850/year for individuals. It’s the fastest way to unlock this article — and everything else.

Unlock Premium Content


>> Explore all membership options